CALF vs. REGL
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 3.73%/yr vs 7.47%/yr for REGL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for REGL.
Performance
CALF vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 7.68% return.
CALF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
REGL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
CALF vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.59% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.68% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and REGL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CALF and REGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CALF vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
REGL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
REGL
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
REGL
Healthcare
CALF
REGL
Energy
CALF
REGL
Communication Services
CALF
REGL
-
Industrials
CALF
REGL
Consumer Defensive
CALF
REGL
Basic Materials
CALF
REGL
Real Estate
CALF
REGL
Financial Services
CALF
REGL
Utilities
CALF
-
REGL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
REGL
CALF vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 1.55 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 4.81 | +6.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and REGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -36.37% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -9.67% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -16.96% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -16.96% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -2.46% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -4.08% | -6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 3.10% | -0.87% |
Volatility
CALF vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.55%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 3.55% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 9.30% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 13.26% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 16.06% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 18.34% | +7.63% |
CALF vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than REGL's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.16% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and REGL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to REGL (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs REGL's -36.37%.
On 5-year performance, REGL leads with 7.47% vs 3.73% for CALF. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REGL has performed better with a 7.47% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.24% for CALF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.40% for REGL.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and REGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer