PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALF vs. REGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALF vs. REGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 12.54% return.


CALF

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.89%
6M
19.77%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%

REGL

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.53%
6M
7.57%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.38M$24.48M$25.33M
$11.86M$8.77M$5.92M

CALF vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
22.50%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
12.54%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and REGL is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.78

The correlation between CALF and REGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CALF vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALF
REGL

Technology

23.4%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

23.2%
10.7%

Energy

13.7%
3.1%

Healthcare

11.6%
4.6%

Industrials

9.3%
15.5%

Communication Services

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
7.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
32.0%

Utilities

-

13.4%

Technology

CALF
23.4%
REGL
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CALF
23.2%
REGL
10.7%

Energy

CALF
13.7%
REGL
3.1%

Healthcare

CALF
11.6%
REGL
4.6%

Industrials

CALF
9.3%
REGL
15.5%

Communication Services

CALF
7.6%
REGL

-

Consumer Defensive

CALF
5.3%
REGL
2.6%

Basic Materials

CALF
4.2%
REGL
8.7%

Real Estate

CALF
1.8%
REGL
7.6%

Financial Services

CALF
0.2%
REGL
32.0%

Utilities

CALF

-

REGL
13.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALF vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CALF vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CALFREGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.13

1.70

+4.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.68

5.31

+12.38

CALF vs. REGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the REGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and REGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CALF vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and REGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALFREGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.58%

-36.37%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-9.67%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-16.96%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

-16.96%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.92%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-4.05%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.09%

-1.00%

Volatility

CALF vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 4.14%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALFREGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

4.14%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

9.52%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

13.12%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

16.03%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

18.31%

+7.58%

CALF vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALF vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than REGL's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.12%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.17%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALF and REGL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to REGL (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs REGL's -36.37%.

On 5-year performance, REGL leads with 8.17% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, REGL has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.12% for CALF.

CALF is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.40% for REGL.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALF and REGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer