CALF vs. SFLO
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index while SFLO tracks the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CALF returned 32.12% vs 34.14% for SFLO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SFLO.
Performance
CALF vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CALF having a 14.39% return and SFLO slightly higher at 15.09%.
CALF
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLO
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 34.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.39% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 0.11% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 15.09% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and SFLO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CALF and SFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CALF vs. SFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
SFLO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
SFLO
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
SFLO
Energy
CALF
SFLO
Healthcare
CALF
SFLO
Communication Services
CALF
SFLO
Industrials
CALF
SFLO
Consumer Defensive
CALF
SFLO
Real Estate
CALF
SFLO
Basic Materials
CALF
SFLO
Financial Services
CALF
SFLO
Utilities
CALF
-
SFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
SFLO
CALF vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALF | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.40 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.95 | 14.62 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALF | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.99 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.67 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
CALF vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than SFLO's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and SFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -26.63% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -7.80% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.40% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -4.33% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.34% | -0.19% |
Volatility
CALF vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) is 4.88%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | SFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 5.38% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 11.51% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 17.21% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 20.55% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 20.55% | +5.46% |
CALF vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than SFLO's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.35% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.84% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CALF and SFLO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SFLO has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to CALF (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs SFLO's -26.63%.
On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 34.14% vs 32.12% for CALF. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 34.14% return vs 32.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.84% for SFLO.
CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.49% for SFLO.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and SFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer