CALF vs. ECML

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF) and ECML (Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. CALF is passively managed, while ECML is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CALF returned 8.57%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for ECML. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ECML.

Performance

CALF vs. ECML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than ECML's 19.84% return.

CALF

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 4.89%
• 6M: 19.77%
• YTD: 22.50%
• 1Y: 39.59%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.37%

ECML

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 13.37%
• YTD: 19.84%
• 1Y: 32.00%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF	$20.38M	$24.48M	$25.33M
ECML Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	$548.16K	$300.59K	$261.72K

CALF vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF	22.50%	2.33%	-7.41%	29.56%
ECML Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	19.84%	6.82%	2.37%	26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and ECML is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.88

The correlation between CALF and ECML shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CALF vs. ECML - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CALF	ECML
Technology	23.4%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	23.2%	24.6%
Energy	13.7%	13.2%
Healthcare	11.6%	14.4%
Industrials	9.3%	13.0%
Communication Services	7.6%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	12.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	11.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

CALF vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CALF

CALF Risk / Return Rank: 92
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 94

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 90
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CALF vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) and Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CALF	ECML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.23	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.40	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.13	4.46	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.68	13.07	+4.61

CALF vs. ECML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ECML Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and ECML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CALF vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and ECML.

Drawdown Indicators

	CALF	ECML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.58%	-24.66%	-22.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.02%	-7.01%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.22%	-24.66%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-1.11%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-5.62%	-4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.39%	-0.30%

Volatility

CALF vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 3.32%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CALF	ECML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	3.32%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	9.21%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	14.05%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.23%	18.12%	+5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.89%	18.12%	+7.77%

CALF vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CALF vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than ECML's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF	1.12%	1.43%	1.07%	1.18%	0.85%	2.63%	0.82%	0.99%	1.39%	0.70%
ECML Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.15%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CALF and ECML in my portfolio?

CALF and ECML have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CALF or ECML?

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to ECML (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs ECML's -24.66%.

Which ETF is better, CALF or ECML?

On 3-year performance, ECML leads with 12.03% vs 8.57% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ECML has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CALF or ECML?

Over the 3-year period, ECML has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CALF or ECML?

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CALF or ECML?

ECML has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.12% for CALF.

What is the main difference between CALF and ECML?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Euclidean. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.95% for ECML.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.