PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALF vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALF vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return.


CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALF vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and CSB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.85

The correlation between CALF and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CALF vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALF
CSB

Technology

29.7%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

28.3%
19.0%

Energy

10.3%
11.5%

Healthcare

9.4%
0.4%

Communication Services

8.8%
3.6%

Industrials

5.9%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
26.5%

Utilities

-

22.0%

Technology

CALF
29.7%
CSB
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CALF
28.3%
CSB
19.0%

Energy

CALF
10.3%
CSB
11.5%

Healthcare

CALF
9.4%
CSB
0.4%

Communication Services

CALF
8.8%
CSB
3.6%

Industrials

CALF
5.9%
CSB
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

CALF
4.3%
CSB
4.4%

Real Estate

CALF
1.6%
CSB

-

Basic Materials

CALF
1.6%
CSB
3.4%

Financial Services

CALF
0.2%
CSB
26.5%

Utilities

CALF

-

CSB
22.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALF vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALF vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CALFCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

2.51

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

7.26

+6.82

CALF vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CALFCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.25

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.20

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.45

-0.08

Drawdowns

CALF vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALFCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.58%

-42.07%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-7.18%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-21.82%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

-24.49%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-3.12%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-7.14%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.48%

-0.33%

Volatility

CALF vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALFCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.59%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

9.19%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

14.54%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

18.78%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

21.31%

+4.71%

CALF vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALF vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALF and CSB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, CALF leads with 4.12% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CALF has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.

CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.35% for CSB.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALF and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer