CAIE vs. XRMI
CAIE (Calamos Autocallable Income ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds - CAIE tracks the MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Index while XRMI tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CAIE returned 23.25% vs 8.38% for XRMI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAIE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
CAIE vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIE achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.48% return.
CAIE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 23.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 8.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAIE vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF | 7.04% | 15.12% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.48% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIE and XRMI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CAIE and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
CAIE vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAIE
XRMI
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
CAIE
XRMI
Communication Services
CAIE
-
XRMI
Consumer Cyclical
CAIE
-
XRMI
Consumer Defensive
CAIE
-
XRMI
Energy
CAIE
-
XRMI
Financial Services
CAIE
-
XRMI
Healthcare
CAIE
-
XRMI
Industrials
CAIE
-
XRMI
Real Estate
CAIE
-
XRMI
Technology
CAIE
-
XRMI
Utilities
CAIE
-
XRMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIE vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
CAIE
XRMI
CAIE vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.68 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.03 | 6.75 | +6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIE vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIE drawdown since its inception was -7.73%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIE and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -15.31% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -5.02% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.70% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -5.86% | +4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.24% | +0.55% |
Volatility
CAIE vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.70%. This indicates that CAIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 1.70% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 4.41% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 5.50% | +6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 6.90% | +5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 6.90% | +5.10% |
CAIE vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIE vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.34%, more than XRMI's 12.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF | 13.34% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.75% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAIE and XRMI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAIE has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to XRMI (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAIE dropped -7.73% vs XRMI's -15.31%.
On 1-year performance, CAIE leads with 23.25% vs 8.38% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CAIE has performed better with a 23.25% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIE.
CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 13.34%, compared with 12.75% for XRMI.
CAIE tracks MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIE and 0.60% for XRMI.
CAIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAIE and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer