CAIE vs. GPIQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ).

CAIE and GPIQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAIE is a passively managed fund by Calamos that tracks the performance of the MerQube US Large Cap Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2025. GPIQ is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023.

Performance

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF	-3.27%	15.15%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	-2.85%	13.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIE achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's -2.85% return.

CAIE

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -3.60%
• YTD: -3.27%
• 6M: -1.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -2.85%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 23.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

CAIE

Calamos Autocallable Income ETF

GPIQ

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

CAIE vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAIE	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	1.31	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CAIE and GPIQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, more than GPIQ's 10.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAIE Calamos Autocallable Income ETF	11.86%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	10.75%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%

Drawdowns

CAIE vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIE drawdown since its inception was -7.73%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIE and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIE	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-21.06%	+13.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.08%	-5.62%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-2.38%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAIE	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	20.45%	-8.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.32%	17.74%	-5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.32%	17.74%	-5.42%