PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAIE vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAIE vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIE achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 105.82% return.


CAIE

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
7.04%
6M
5.77%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
2.07%
1M
3.79%
YTD
105.82%
6M
106.26%
1Y
188.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIE vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAIE and AMDY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAIE vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAIE
CAIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CAIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIE vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAIEAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

6.87

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

15.32

-2.29

CAIE vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAIE and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAIE vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIE drawdown since its inception was -7.73%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIE and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAIEAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-53.92%

+46.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-27.59%

+19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-2.61%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-17.73%

+16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

12.35%

-10.56%

Volatility

CAIE vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) is 3.37%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.32%. This indicates that CAIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAIEAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

20.32%

-16.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

43.45%

-35.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

56.04%

-44.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.00%

46.88%

-34.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.00%

46.88%

-34.88%

CAIE vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAIE vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.34%, less than AMDY's 67.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
67.14%80.68%109.98%6.68%
CAIE
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF
13.34%7.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAIE and AMDY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to CAIE (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAIE dropped -7.73% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 188.40% vs 23.25% for CAIE. On fees, CAIE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, CAIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 188.40% return vs 23.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAIE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 67.14%, compared with 13.34% for CAIE.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIE and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAIE and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer