CAIBX vs. FKTFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAIBX (American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A) and FKTFX (Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund) are both mutual funds - CAIBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while FKTFX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, CAIBX returned 7.94%/yr vs 2.35%/yr for FKTFX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAIBX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FKTFX.

Performance

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) and Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIBX achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than FKTFX's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CAIBX has outperformed FKTFX with an annualized return of 7.94%, while FKTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.

CAIBX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 7.79%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 8.54%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

FKTFX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 7.70%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: 0.95%
• 10Y*: 2.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAIBX American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A	7.79%	20.39%	10.24%	8.95%	-7.14%	14.99%	3.20%	17.23%	-7.28%	13.99%
FKTFX Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund	1.73%	4.38%	2.78%	6.25%	-10.31%	1.80%	5.29%	9.73%	0.31%	6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIBX and FKTFX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1987	0.06

Over the past year, CAIBX and FKTFX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CAIBX vs. FKTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAIBX

CAIBX Risk / Return Rank: 60
CAIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CAIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CAIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CAIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CAIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FKTFX

FKTFX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FKTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FKTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FKTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FKTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FKTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) and Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAIBX	FKTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.41	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.77	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.64	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.42	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.49	7.93	+3.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAIBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FKTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAIBX and FKTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAIBX	FKTFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.41	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.21	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.50	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.63	+0.30

Drawdowns

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIBX drawdown since its inception was -43.68%, which is greater than FKTFX's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIBX and FKTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIBX	FKTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.68%	-31.16%	-12.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-3.20%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.89%	-6.47%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	-16.21%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.28%	-16.21%	-9.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.50%	+0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-6.10%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	0.97%	+0.66%

Volatility

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX) at 1.32%. This indicates that CAIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAIBX	FKTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	1.32%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.42%	2.43%	+3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00%	3.23%	+4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.98%	4.50%	+5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.88%	4.77%	+6.11%

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIBX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FKTFX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAIBX vs. FKTFX - Dividend Comparison

CAIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, more than FKTFX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAIBX American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A	7.22%	7.71%	5.76%	3.47%	3.43%	3.14%	3.38%	4.10%	3.55%	4.44%	3.52%	3.62%
FKTFX Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund	3.77%	4.96%	4.22%	3.20%	3.29%	2.68%	2.91%	3.85%	3.58%	3.58%	3.65%	3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAIBX and FKTFX in my portfolio?

CAIBX and FKTFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAIBX or FKTFX?

CAIBX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FKTFX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAIBX dropped -43.68% vs FKTFX's -31.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.