PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKTFX vs. MAMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX) and Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKTFX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than MAMTX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FKTFX has outperformed MAMTX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while MAMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.11% annualized return.


FKTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.07%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
2.34%

MAMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.19%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKTFX
Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund
1.58%4.38%2.78%6.25%-10.31%1.80%5.29%9.73%0.31%6.08%
MAMTX
Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust
1.85%3.97%3.90%4.89%-12.11%5.84%0.58%6.81%1.27%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FKTFX and MAMTX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 1988

0.62

The correlation between FKTFX and MAMTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKTFX vs. MAMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKTFX
FKTFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FKTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FKTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MAMTX
MAMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MAMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX) and Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKTFXMAMTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

2.12

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

3.29

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.49

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.48

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

8.32

-0.70

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the MAMTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKTFX and MAMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKTFXMAMTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.12

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.12

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.19

-0.57

Drawdowns

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKTFX drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than MAMTX's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKTFX and MAMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKTFXMAMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

-16.83%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-2.85%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.47%

-6.33%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-16.83%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.21%

-16.83%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.20%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-2.06%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.85%

+0.12%

Volatility

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund (FKTFX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust (MAMTX) at 1.11%. This indicates that FKTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKTFXMAMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.11%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

2.28%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

3.17%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

4.78%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

4.84%

-0.07%

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKTFX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than MAMTX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKTFX vs. MAMTX - Dividend Comparison

FKTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than MAMTX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKTFX
Franklin California Tax Free Income Fund
3.77%4.96%4.22%3.20%3.29%2.68%2.91%3.85%3.58%3.58%3.65%3.93%
MAMTX
Blackrock Strategic Municipal Opportunities Fund Of Blackrock Municipal Series Trust
3.91%5.00%4.23%2.70%1.96%2.00%2.39%2.83%4.74%2.89%3.91%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKTFX and MAMTX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKTFX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to MAMTX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKTFX dropped -31.16% vs MAMTX's -16.83%.

FKTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKTFX and MAMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer