PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAH vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAH vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CAH has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.65%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


CAH

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.02%
6M
6.75%
YTD
10.63%
1Y
42.95%
3Y*
36.39%
5Y*
33.84%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
17.17%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAH vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
10.63%76.25%19.01%34.15%54.08%-0.40%10.09%18.04%-24.50%-12.65%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CAH and T is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987

0.23

The correlation between CAH and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAH:

$52.87B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

CAH:

$6.57

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

CAH:

34.37

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

CAH:

0.81

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

CAH:

0.21

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAH:

$250.55B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAH:

$9.23B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAH:

$2.79B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAH vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAH
CAH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAH vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.92

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

-0.46

+2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

-1.03

+7.52

CAH vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAH and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAH vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.93%

-64.15%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.42%

-28.89%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-28.89%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.80%

-32.01%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.13%

-42.35%

-3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-21.57%

+15.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-15.74%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

12.94%

-6.23%

Volatility

CAH vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) is 6.16%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that CAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

9.59%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

19.91%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.23%

23.72%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

24.38%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.25%

23.92%

+5.33%

Dividends

CAH vs. T - Dividend Comparison

CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
0.91%0.99%1.28%1.98%2.57%3.80%3.62%3.80%4.24%3.00%2.41%1.68%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

CAH vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
60.94B
33.47B
(CAH) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CAH and T have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to CAH (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAH dropped -61.93% vs T's -64.15%.

CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAH and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer