CAGE vs. AMDW
CAGE (Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CAGE vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAGE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- 9.04%
- 1M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 213.89%
- 6M
- 211.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAGE vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAGE Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF | 10.75% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 156.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAGE and AMDW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAGE vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAGE vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAGE drawdown since its inception was -6.60%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGE and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAGE | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -34.64% | +28.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | 0.00% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -14.04% | +12.40% |
Volatility
CAGE vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAGE | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.47% | 83.18% | -62.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 83.18% | -62.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 83.18% | -62.71% |
Dividends
CAGE vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
CAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 34.85% | 34.78% |
CAGE Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAGE and AMDW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 34.85%, compared with 0.00% for CAGE.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for CAGE and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer