CAG vs. JEPQ
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, CAG returned -18.70%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for JEPQ. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CAG vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.89% return.
CAG
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- 6M
- -12.91%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -17.42%
- 3Y*
- -18.70%
- 5Y*
- -11.75%
- 10Y*
- -5.50%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAG vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -12.61% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 13.14% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.89% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and JEPQ is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | -0.02 |
The correlation between CAG and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
JEPQ
CAG vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.29 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.39 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 10.98 | -11.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -20.07% | -42.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -8.82% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -20.07% | -36.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.89% | -2.57% | -54.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -3.37% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.52% | 1.92% | +15.60% |
Volatility
CAG vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 5.76%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.84% | 5.76% | +7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.32% | 11.42% | +12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.77% | 13.83% | +15.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 16.82% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 16.82% | +9.66% |
Dividends
CAG vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, less than JEPQ's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.68% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.57% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to JEPQ (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer