CAFX vs. CRUX
CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAFX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
CAFX vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAFX vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.21% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAFX and CRUX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAFX vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
CAFX
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAFX vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAFX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAFX vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFX drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFX and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAFX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -1.85% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.58% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -0.60% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility
CAFX vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAFX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 4.12% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 4.12% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 4.12% | -0.96% |
CAFX vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAFX vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
CAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.01% | 3.92% | 0.96% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAFX and CRUX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CAFX.
CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Congress and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAFX and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for CAFX and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer