CAFX vs. CAML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) and CAML (Congress Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAFX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Congress, while CAML is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Congress. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CAFX returned 3.95% vs 15.24% for CAML. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAFX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAML.

Performance

CAFX vs. CAML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) and Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than CAML's 5.82% return.

CAFX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.37%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAML

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 15.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAFX vs. CAML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF	0.28%	6.46%	-1.66%
CAML Congress Large Cap Growth ETF	5.82%	12.43%	7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFX and CAML is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.11

The correlation between CAFX and CAML shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CAFX vs. CAML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFX

CAFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
CAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CAML

CAML Risk / Return Rank: 27
CAML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CAML Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CAML Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CAML Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CAML Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFX vs. CAML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) and Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAFX	CAML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.05	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.54	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.19	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.03	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	3.39	+3.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAFX vs. CAML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CAML Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFX and CAML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAFX	CAML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.05	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.07	-0.15

Drawdowns

CAFX vs. CAML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFX drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, smaller than the maximum CAML drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFX and CAML.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAFX	CAML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-21.06%	+18.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	-14.86%	+13.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.86%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-3.08%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	4.50%	-3.89%

Volatility

CAFX vs. CAML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) is 0.75%, while Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that CAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAFX	CAML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	3.65%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.84%	11.35%	-9.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	14.63%	-11.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.16%	17.76%	-14.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.16%	17.76%	-14.60%

CAFX vs. CAML - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CAML's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAFX vs. CAML - Dividend Comparison

CAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while CAML has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF	4.01%	3.92%	0.96%	0.00%
CAML Congress Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAFX and CAML in my portfolio?

CAFX and CAML have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAFX or CAML?

CAML has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to CAFX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFX dropped -2.63% vs CAML's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, CAFX or CAML?

On 1-year performance, CAML leads with 15.24% vs 3.95% for CAFX. On fees, CAFX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CAFX has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAFX or CAML?

Over the 1-year period, CAML has performed better with a 15.24% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAFX or CAML?

CAFX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAFX or CAML?

CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.00% for CAML.

What is the main difference between CAFX and CAML?

CAFX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CAML is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAFX and 0.65% for CAML.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.