CAEIX vs. GWOAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) and GWOAX (GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX returned 10.96%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GWOAX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CAEIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for GWOAX.

Performance

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 17.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX has underperformed GWOAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while GWOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.

CAEIX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -2.99%
• 6M: 4.43%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 1Y: 25.28%
• 3Y*: 8.88%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: 10.96%
• ALL TIME*: 1.09%

GWOAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 11.02%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 1Y: 35.41%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 12.15%
• ALL TIME*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	11.37%	32.61%	-7.13%	5.67%	-17.43%	6.73%	61.52%	33.48%	-19.26%	29.65%
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	17.69%	28.37%	6.14%	22.49%	-14.10%	18.53%	10.53%	26.56%	-12.95%	25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CAEIX and GWOAX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007	0.83

The correlation between CAEIX and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CAEIX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAEIX

CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GWOAX

GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAEIX	GWOAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.71	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.72	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.49	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.96	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	15.74	-9.19

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAEIX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than GWOAX's maximum drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and GWOAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAEIX	GWOAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.81%	-49.84%	-25.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.97%	-8.78%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.01%	-16.11%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.58%	-26.21%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.54%	-35.28%	-2.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.53%	0.00%	-9.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.27%	-8.93%	-39.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	2.21%	+1.56%

Volatility

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.20%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAEIX	GWOAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	3.20%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.74%	10.20%	+4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.87%	12.88%	+4.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	15.22%	+4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	16.39%	+3.17%

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAEIX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GWOAX's 5.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	0.65%	0.72%	1.17%	1.07%	0.86%	0.49%	0.82%	1.23%	2.00%	1.40%	1.79%	0.72%
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	5.37%	4.46%	0.60%	6.10%	7.27%	12.75%	3.85%	4.33%	3.02%	3.05%	6.43%	12.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAEIX and GWOAX in my portfolio?

CAEIX and GWOAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAEIX or GWOAX?

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to GWOAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.