PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CABZ vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CABZ vs. FTEC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CABZ is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.

Performance

CABZ vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

CABZ

1D
-0.85%
1M
-15.95%
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FTEC

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
23.03%
6M
20.95%
1Y
43.02%
3Y*
30.75%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
25.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
CABZ
Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF		-13.70%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF		21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and FTEC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.83

CABZ vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CABZ
FTEC

Technology

46.6%
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

36.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

11.1%
0.0%

Industrials

4.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CABZ
46.6%
FTEC
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CABZ
36.2%
FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

CABZ
11.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Industrials

CABZ
4.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Basic Materials

CABZ

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

CABZ

-

FTEC

-

Energy

CABZ

-

FTEC
0.3%

Financial Services

CABZ

-

FTEC
0.6%

Healthcare

CABZ

-

FTEC

-

Real Estate

CABZ

-

FTEC

-

Utilities

CABZ

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

Often compared with CABZ:
CABZ vs. SOXXCABZ vs. TIMECABZ vs. ARMHCABZ vs. MAGXCABZ vs. QDTECABZ vs. TDVCABZ vs. AIS
Often compared with FTEC:
FTEC vs. VGTFTEC vs. QQQMFTEC vs. QQQFTEC vs. FSPTXFTEC vs. XLKFTEC vs. FXAIXFTEC vs. SMH

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CABZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CABZFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.90

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.43

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.32

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.66

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

8.09

—

CABZ vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and FTEC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CABZFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-34.95%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-16.26%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-27.30%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-34.95%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.95%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.74%

-8.11%

-9.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-5.57%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

5.34%

—

Volatility

CABZ vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CABZFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

11.20%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

18.56%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.19%

22.73%

+11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.19%

25.60%

+8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.19%

24.85%

+9.34%

CABZ vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CABZ
Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF		0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

CABZ and FTEC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.08% for FTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CABZ and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer