CABDX vs. AWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CABDX (AB Relative Value Fund) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - CABDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, CABDX returned 11.10%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for AWF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CABDX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

CABDX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CABDX achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CABDX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 11.10%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.

CABDX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

AWF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABDX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	10.85%	10.26%	12.63%	11.24%	-4.23%	27.48%	2.81%	23.06%	-6.00%	18.84%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.70%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CABDX and AWF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1993	0.32

The correlation between CABDX and AWF shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CABDX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABDX

CABDX Risk / Return Rank: 57
CABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABDX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CABDX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	0.16	+1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	0.29	+2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.04	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	0.14	+3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.35	0.33	+12.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CABDX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CABDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CABDX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CABDX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	0.16	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.35	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.38	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.31	+0.32

Drawdowns

CABDX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABDX drawdown since its inception was -57.40%, roughly equal to the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABDX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABDX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.40%	-55.54%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.21%	-10.19%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.69%	-11.12%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.53%	-25.25%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.33%	-40.12%	+3.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-5.81%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-12.31%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	4.26%	-2.55%

Volatility

CABDX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) is 2.80%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that CABDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CABDX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	3.53%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	7.25%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	8.70%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	12.11%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	15.22%	+1.29%

CABDX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABDX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABDX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

CABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than AWF's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.68%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	5.46%	6.05%	11.24%	6.55%	8.00%	10.15%	1.18%	4.45%	15.34%	12.71%	6.97%	4.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABDX and AWF in my portfolio?

CABDX and AWF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CABDX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to CABDX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CABDX dropped -57.40% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CABDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.