CABDX vs. ACGYX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX).

CABDX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 1932. ACGYX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Aug 28, 1987.

Performance

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	0.62%	10.26%	12.63%	11.24%	-4.23%	27.48%	2.81%	23.06%	-6.00%	18.84%
ACGYX AB Income Fund	-1.08%	7.86%	2.07%	6.16%	-15.45%	-1.30%	6.88%	11.25%	-1.21%	6.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CABDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than ACGYX's -1.08% return.

CABDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 3.12%
• 1Y: 9.01%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

ACGYX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -2.90%
• YTD: -1.08%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: 4.04%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABDX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGYX's 0.54% expense ratio.

CABDX

AB Relative Value Fund

ACGYX

AB Income Fund

Return for Risk

CABDX vs. ACGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABDX

CABDX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ACGYX

ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 42
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CABDX	ACGYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	0.85	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	1.19	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.15	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	1.37	-0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	4.45	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CABDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the ACGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CABDX and ACGYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CABDX	ACGYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	0.85	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	-0.01	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.39	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CABDX and ACGYX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Dividend Comparison

CABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than ACGYX's 4.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	6.01%	6.05%	11.24%	6.55%	8.00%	10.15%	1.18%	4.45%	15.34%	12.71%	6.97%	4.34%
ACGYX AB Income Fund	4.62%	5.02%	5.38%	4.04%	3.99%	2.95%	3.80%	4.50%	4.54%	5.84%	3.23%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABDX drawdown since its inception was -57.40%, which is greater than ACGYX's maximum drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABDX and ACGYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABDX	ACGYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.40%	-21.58%	-35.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-3.36%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.53%	-21.58%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-3.84%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-5.45%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.04%	+1.57%

Volatility

CABDX vs. ACGYX - Volatility Comparison

AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to AB Income Fund (ACGYX) at 1.68%. This indicates that CABDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CABDX	ACGYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	1.68%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.79%	2.77%	+5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.06%	4.71%	+10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	6.45%	+8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	5.44%	+11.07%