CABDX vs. AGRFX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX).
CABDX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 1932. AGRFX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund | 0.62% | 10.26% | 12.63% | 11.24% | -4.23% | 27.48% | 2.81% | 23.06% | -6.00% | 18.84% |
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | -12.87% | 10.84% | 31.50% | 37.95% | -29.65% | 21.40% | 35.97% | 31.11% | 3.75% | 33.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CABDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than AGRFX's -12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CABDX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.
CABDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
AGRFX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -13.78%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CABDX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CABDX vs. AGRFX — Risk / Return Rank
CABDX
AGRFX
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CABDX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 0.58 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.22 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 0.83 | +2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CABDX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.41 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CABDX and AGRFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison
CABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than AGRFX's 18.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund | 6.01% | 6.05% | 11.24% | 6.55% | 8.00% | 10.15% | 1.18% | 4.45% | 15.34% | 12.71% | 6.97% | 4.34% |
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | 18.79% | 16.37% | 21.03% | 7.20% | 1.69% | 9.79% | 5.79% | 7.80% | 16.01% | 9.33% | 1.03% | 9.76% |
Drawdowns
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABDX drawdown since its inception was -57.40%, smaller than the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABDX and AGRFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABDX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -61.88% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -15.92% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.53% | -35.21% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.33% | -35.21% | -1.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -15.92% | +9.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -15.82% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.28% | -1.67% |
Volatility
CABDX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) is 3.28%, while AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that CABDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CABDX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 5.75% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 11.87% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 20.55% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 20.79% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 20.39% | -3.88% |