C50U.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

C50U.L is traded in USD, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C50U.L achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.61% return.

C50U.L

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 10.48%
• 10Y*: —

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 6M: 17.98%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 9.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
C50U.L Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)	6.12%	37.30%	4.69%	26.93%	-13.63%	15.13%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.61%	35.19%	-0.27%	20.43%	-15.42%	12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between C50U.L and CMU.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021	0.94

The correlation between C50U.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	C50U.L	CMU.L
Financial Services	25.6%	21.8%
Industrials	22.2%	15.7%
Technology	18.6%	30.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	5.4%	4.2%
Energy	5.2%	0.0%
Utilities	4.7%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	5.2%
Communication Services	2.5%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.8%
Real Estate	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

C50U.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C50U.L

C50U.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
C50U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
C50U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
C50U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
C50U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
C50U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	C50U.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.68	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.43	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	2.21	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	8.18	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C50U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C50U.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	C50U.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.68	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.48	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.36	+0.27

Drawdowns

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	C50U.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.81%	-40.93%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-12.77%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-13.90%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.81%	-35.44%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.49%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	-9.51%	+2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	3.45%	+0.40%

Volatility

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C50U.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	5.95%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.69%	13.76%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	16.77%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	19.34%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	19.39%	+1.23%

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both C50U.L and CMU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

C50U.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither C50U.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C50U.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, C50U.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, C50U.L or CMU.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, C50U.L or CMU.L?

C50U.L and CMU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between C50U.L and CMU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR.