PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

C50U.L is traded in USD, while ETDD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ETDD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with C50U.L having a 6.12% return and ETDD.DE slightly lower at 6.06%.


C50U.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.85%
YTD
6.12%
6M
8.26%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*

ETDD.DE

1D
0.89%
1M
4.04%
YTD
6.06%
6M
8.38%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
C50U.L
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
6.12%37.30%4.69%26.93%-13.63%15.13%
ETDD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.06%37.85%4.47%26.35%-13.70%15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between C50U.L and ETDD.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.94

The correlation between C50U.L and ETDD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C50U.L
C50U.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
C50U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C50U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
C50U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
C50U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
C50U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ETDD.DE
ETDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C50U.LETDD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

4.56

+0.01

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C50U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C50U.L and ETDD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C50U.LETDD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.50

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.29

+0.34

Drawdowns

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum ETDD.DE drawdown of -39.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and ETDD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C50U.LETDD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.81%

-39.04%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-13.09%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-15.53%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-34.94%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.08%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-10.76%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.89%

-0.04%

Volatility

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that C50U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETDD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C50U.LETDD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

5.55%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

14.65%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

17.67%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

20.78%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

20.59%

+0.03%

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C50U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ETDD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

C50U.L vs. ETDD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither C50U.L nor ETDD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, C50U.L and ETDD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, C50U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C50U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ETDD.DE.

C50U.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while ETDD.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C50U.L and 0.18% for ETDD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C50U.L and ETDD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer