C50U.L vs. 500G.L
C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and 500G.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - C50U.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while 500G.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for 500G.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C50U.L is traded in USD, while 500G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 500G.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C50U.L achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than 500G.L's 10.30% return.
C50U.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
500G.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C50U.L Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 6.12% | 37.30% | 4.69% | 26.93% | -13.63% | 15.13% |
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.30% | 17.70% | 25.32% | 26.22% | -18.60% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between C50U.L and 500G.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between C50U.L and 500G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C50U.L vs. 500G.L — Risk / Return Rank
C50U.L
500G.L
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C50U.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.45 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.14 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 13.55 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C50U.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.52 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.88 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.01 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, roughly equal to the maximum 500G.L drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and 500G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C50U.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -33.53% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -8.87% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -19.17% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -24.88% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.54% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -4.23% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.06% | +1.79% |
Volatility
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) at 2.59%. This indicates that C50U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C50U.L | 500G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 2.59% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 7.97% | +6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 11.05% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 15.65% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.13% | +4.49% |
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both C50U.L and 500G.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C50U.L vs. 500G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither C50U.L nor 500G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
C50U.L and 500G.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C50U.L and 500G.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
C50U.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 500G.L is S&P 500. C50U.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while 500G.L tracks S&P 500.
Find the right allocation for C50U.L and 500G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer