C024.DE vs. IROB.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and IROB.DE (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - C024.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A, while IROB.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE returned 6.36%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for IROB.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IROB.DE.

Performance

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than IROB.DE's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE has underperformed IROB.DE with an annualized return of 6.36%, while IROB.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.

C024.DE

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: -8.00%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 0.96%
• 10Y*: 6.36%

IROB.DE

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -9.10%
• 6M: 5.82%
• YTD: 14.36%
• 1Y: 29.03%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist	6.31%	14.97%	22.87%	-17.78%	-16.16%	3.42%	21.54%	40.72%	-22.27%	23.87%
IROB.DE L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	14.36%	10.23%	4.16%	20.99%	-30.11%	26.22%	31.63%	33.78%	-17.80%	28.83%

Correlation

The correlation between C024.DE and IROB.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2015	0.42

The correlation between C024.DE and IROB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C024.DE

C024.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
C024.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
C024.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
C024.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
C024.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
C024.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

IROB.DE

IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	C024.DE	IROB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.19	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.73	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	2.08	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.41	6.61	+3.80

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C024.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C024.DE and IROB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, which is greater than IROB.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and IROB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	C024.DE	IROB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.68%	-36.51%	-13.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-13.67%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.82%	-31.95%	+6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.34%	-36.51%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.10%	-36.51%	-10.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.23%	-12.43%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.23%	-11.40%	-14.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	4.30%	-1.58%

Volatility

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) have volatilities of 9.58% and 9.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C024.DE	IROB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.58%	9.71%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.53%	19.55%	-5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.31%	24.11%	-5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.98%	21.69%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.16%	21.21%	+2.95%

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IROB.DE's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

C024.DE vs. IROB.DE - Dividend Comparison

C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while IROB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist	1.78%	1.89%	2.19%	1.98%	1.34%	1.22%	1.42%	1.88%	2.49%
IROB.DE L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C024.DE and IROB.DE in my portfolio?

C024.DE and IROB.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, C024.DE or IROB.DE?

On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, C024.DE or IROB.DE?

C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IROB.DE.

What is the main difference between C024.DE and IROB.DE?

C024.DE is categorized as China Equities, while IROB.DE is Technology Equities. C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while IROB.DE tracks ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.80% for IROB.DE.