PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
-0.02%24.71%9.50%18.86%-11.92%22.17%-0.74%27.44%-12.93%13.47%
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
-1.30%8.00%26.94%22.28%-13.11%35.34%7.78%34.57%-2.46%9.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XD5E.DE achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZJ.DE's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XD5E.DE has underperformed H4ZJ.DE with an annualized return of 9.47%, while H4ZJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.


XD5E.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
3.20%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
9.47%

H4ZJ.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
1.75%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XD5E.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XD5E.DE
XD5E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZJ.DE
H4ZJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XD5E.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.76

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.10

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.77

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.64

10.58

-3.94

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XD5E.DE and H4ZJ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XD5E.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.76

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.90

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between XD5E.DE and H4ZJ.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XD5E.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than H4ZJ.DE's 1.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
2.63%2.54%2.86%2.74%4.66%1.41%2.94%2.59%1.89%2.51%0.73%0.36%
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
1.29%1.28%2.06%3.02%2.65%2.73%3.30%4.02%4.71%3.58%4.02%3.46%

Drawdowns

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XD5E.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.04%, which is greater than H4ZJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XD5E.DE and H4ZJ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XD5E.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.04%

-33.60%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-8.71%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-21.65%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-33.60%

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-4.01%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-4.07%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.72%

+0.96%

Volatility

XD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) at 4.21%. This indicates that XD5E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XD5E.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

4.21%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

8.44%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

16.15%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

14.16%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

15.09%

+1.89%