PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BZQIY vs. ARE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bezeq Corp Ltd (BZQIY) and Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BZQIY is traded in USD, while ARE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ARE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZQIY achieves a 32.77% return, which is significantly lower than ARE.TO's 43.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BZQIY has underperformed ARE.TO with an annualized return of 7.84%, while ARE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 37.81% annualized return.


BZQIY

1D
0.00%
1M
12.53%
YTD
32.77%
6M
54.17%
1Y
103.67%
3Y*
40.07%
5Y*
27.02%
10Y*
7.84%

ARE.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
-14.47%
YTD
43.61%
6M
65.02%
1Y
141.76%
3Y*
90.86%
5Y*
59.80%
10Y*
37.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BZQIY
Bezeq Corp Ltd
32.77%65.06%16.21%-13.14%17.10%48.36%20.80%-17.74%-35.39%-16.29%
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
43.61%24.63%162.56%139.58%-16.59%38.62%35.88%35.18%-16.09%43.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BZQIY and ARE.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2010

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BZQIY:

$7.83B

ARE.TO:

CA$3.04B

EPS

BZQIY:

$2.37

ARE.TO:

CA$0.53

PE Ratio

BZQIY:

5.95

ARE.TO:

84.66

PEG Ratio

BZQIY:

0.92

ARE.TO:

1.35

PS Ratio

BZQIY:

0.91

ARE.TO:

0.53

PB Ratio

BZQIY:

2.50

ARE.TO:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

BZQIY:

$8.64B

ARE.TO:

CA$5.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BZQIY:

$6.23B

ARE.TO:

CA$398.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

BZQIY:

$3.73B

ARE.TO:

CA$185.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZQIY
BZQIY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BZQIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BZQIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BZQIY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BZQIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BZQIY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ARE.TO
ARE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bezeq Corp Ltd (BZQIY) and Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BZQIYARE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

3.66

-1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

4.29

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.53

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.84

6.40

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.59

19.85

+1.75

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZQIY Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZQIY and ARE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BZQIYARE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

3.66

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.38

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.97

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.63

-0.52

Drawdowns

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZQIY drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than ARE.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZQIY and ARE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BZQIYARE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-54.02%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-22.61%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.64%

-43.44%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-44.57%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.44%

-46.28%

-27.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.87%

+21.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

-16.28%

-16.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

7.28%

-2.48%

Volatility

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Bezeq Corp Ltd (BZQIY) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) at 12.29%. This indicates that BZQIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BZQIYARE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

12.29%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.31%

27.01%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.10%

39.22%

+11.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.94%

43.66%

+18.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.10%

39.37%

+14.73%

Dividends

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Dividend Comparison

BZQIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than ARE.TO's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
1.69%2.43%21.86%43.61%59.93%30.69%29.83%26.14%2.84%2.51%3.02%2.60%
BZQIY
Bezeq Corp Ltd
4.54%4.61%5.36%4.77%3.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.87%5.78%11.67%8.00%

Financials

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bezeq Corp Ltd and Aecon Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.17B
1.26B
(BZQIY) Total Revenue
(ARE.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BZQIY values in USD, ARE.TO values in CAD

BZQIY vs. ARE.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bezeq Corp Ltd and Aecon Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
29.6%
8.0%
Portfolio components
BZQIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bezeq Corp Ltd reported a gross profit of 644.71M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.

ARE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.55M and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.0%.

BZQIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bezeq Corp Ltd reported an operating income of 445.18M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

ARE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported an operating income of -6.50M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

BZQIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bezeq Corp Ltd reported a net income of 211.56M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

ARE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported a net income of -17.92M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BZQIY and ARE.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BZQIY and ARE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer