PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARE.TO vs. STN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Stantec Inc. (STN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARE.TO achieves a 43.18% return, which is significantly higher than STN.TO's -21.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE.TO has outperformed STN.TO with an annualized return of 38.59%, while STN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.


ARE.TO

1D
-1.07%
1M
-18.16%
YTD
43.18%
6M
62.06%
1Y
138.99%
3Y*
92.06%
5Y*
63.75%
10Y*
38.59%

STN.TO

1D
-1.30%
1M
-17.65%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-23.39%
1Y
-28.58%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
13.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
43.18%18.93%185.08%134.25%-10.60%37.60%33.22%28.75%-9.02%34.60%
STN.TO
Stantec Inc.
-21.00%15.61%6.81%65.43%-7.62%74.10%14.27%25.51%-13.44%5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ARE.TO and STN.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1994

0.17

Over the past year, ARE.TO and STN.TO have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARE.TO:

CA$3.00B

STN.TO:

CA$11.65B

EPS

ARE.TO:

CA$0.53

STN.TO:

CA$4.30

PE Ratio

ARE.TO:

83.75

STN.TO:

23.77

PEG Ratio

ARE.TO:

1.34

STN.TO:

1.00

PS Ratio

ARE.TO:

0.52

STN.TO:

1.47

PB Ratio

ARE.TO:

2.81

STN.TO:

3.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$5.63B

STN.TO:

CA$7.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$398.23M

STN.TO:

CA$3.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARE.TO:

CA$185.76M

STN.TO:

CA$1.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARE.TO
ARE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

STN.TO
STN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
STN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
STN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
STN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
STN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Stantec Inc. (STN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARE.TOSTN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.82

+0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

-0.78

+7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.67

-1.79

+21.46

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the STN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARE.TO and STN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARE.TOSTN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

-1.04

+4.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.53

0.62

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.56

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.51

-0.42

Drawdowns

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than STN.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE.TO and STN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARE.TOSTN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.67%

-60.46%

-39.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.58%

-36.84%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.21%

-36.84%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.21%

-36.84%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

-36.84%

-7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.58%

-35.45%

+13.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-14.50%

-55.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.12%

15.98%

-8.86%

Volatility

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) is 10.80%, while Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that ARE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARE.TOSTN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

13.16%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.94%

23.56%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.19%

27.49%

+10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.05%

23.74%

+18.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.64%

23.85%

+13.79%

Dividends

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ARE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than STN.TO's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
1.71%2.43%21.86%43.61%59.93%30.69%29.83%26.14%2.84%2.51%3.02%2.60%
STN.TO
Stantec Inc.
0.90%0.69%0.74%0.73%1.11%0.93%1.50%1.98%1.85%1.42%1.33%1.22%

Financials

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aecon Group Inc. and Stantec Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.26B
2.07B
(ARE.TO) Total Revenue
(STN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ARE.TO vs. STN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aecon Group Inc. and Stantec Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
8.0%
39.6%
Portfolio components
ARE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.55M and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.0%.

STN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a gross profit of 819.30M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

ARE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported an operating income of -6.50M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

STN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported an operating income of 174.60M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

ARE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aecon Group Inc. reported a net income of -17.92M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.

STN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a net income of 110.80M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARE.TO and STN.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARE.TO and STN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer