ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ARE.TO or BDT.TO.
Key characteristics
| ARE.TO | BDT.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 44.88% | 61.66% |
| 1Y Return | 70.87% | 115.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.94% | 38.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.05% | 40.17% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.19% | 9.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.98 | 3.19 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.93% | 36.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.66% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -54.89% | -100.00% |
Fundamentals
| ARE.TO | BDT.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$1.16B | CA$1.27B |
| EPS | -CA$0.27 | CA$1.55 |
| PEG Ratio | -8.20 | 2.55 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$4.07B | CA$3.14B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$68.53M | CA$276.17M |
Correlation
The correlation between ARE.TO and BDT.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ARE.TO achieves a 44.88% return, which is significantly lower than BDT.TO's 61.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE.TO has underperformed BDT.TO with an annualized return of 5.19%, while BDT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ARE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than BDT.TO's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARE.TO Aecon Group Inc. | 4.05% | 5.66% | 8.12% | 4.15% | 3.91% | 3.31% | 2.84% | 2.51% | 3.02% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 1.99% |
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 1.96% | 2.94% | 4.80% | 3.97% | 4.88% | 5.45% | 6.38% | 3.85% | 8.38% | 5.84% | 6.84% | 5.79% |
Drawdowns
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, roughly equal to the maximum BDT.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE.TO and BDT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) is 6.96%, while Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a volatility of 16.73%. This indicates that ARE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ARE.TO vs. BDT.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aecon Group Inc. and Bird Construction Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities