PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ARE.TOBDGI.TO
YTD Return77.79%1.99%
1Y Return121.57%18.76%
3Y Return (Ann)9.92%6.69%
5Y Return (Ann)9.61%3.56%
10Y Return (Ann)8.85%6.50%
Sharpe Ratio3.320.65
Sortino Ratio3.381.16
Omega Ratio1.681.13
Calmar Ratio1.510.63
Martin Ratio22.941.19
Ulcer Index5.19%16.20%
Daily Std Dev35.94%29.43%
Max Drawdown-99.67%-94.27%
Current Drawdown-46.16%-19.27%

Fundamentals


ARE.TOBDGI.TO
Market CapCA$1.40BCA$1.41B
EPS-CA$0.27CA$1.67
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$2.83BCA$521.55M
Gross Profit (TTM)-CA$30.19MCA$139.99M
EBITDA (TTM)-CA$129.22MCA$90.50M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between ARE.TO and BDGI.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ARE.TO achieves a 77.79% return, which is significantly higher than BDGI.TO's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ARE.TO has outperformed BDGI.TO with an annualized return of 8.85%, while BDGI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
38.27%
-12.37%
ARE.TO
BDGI.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARE.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARE.TO, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARE.TO, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARE.TO, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.63
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARE.TO, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARE.TO, currently valued at 21.02, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0021.02
BDGI.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGI.TO, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGI.TO, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGI.TO, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGI.TO, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGI.TO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.10

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARE.TO and BDGI.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
3.23
0.59
ARE.TO
BDGI.TO

Dividends

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Dividend Comparison

ARE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than BDGI.TO's 1.74% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ARE.TO
Aecon Group Inc.
3.36%5.66%8.12%4.15%3.91%3.31%2.84%2.51%3.02%2.60%3.36%1.99%
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
1.74%1.69%2.48%1.97%1.56%1.61%1.61%1.55%1.20%1.47%1.36%0.00%

Drawdowns

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARE.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.67%, which is greater than BDGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -94.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARE.TO and BDGI.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-1.05%
-20.48%
ARE.TO
BDGI.TO

Volatility

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) is 4.31%, while Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that ARE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.31%
8.57%
ARE.TO
BDGI.TO

Financials

ARE.TO vs. BDGI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aecon Group Inc. and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items