BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L
BYBU.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) and VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - BYBU.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR while VUSA.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BYBU.L returned 10.16%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for VUSA.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BYBU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUSA.L.
Performance
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BYBU.L is traded in USD, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBU.L achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.L's 10.25% return.
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.18% | 17.38% | 14.97% | 15.90% | -12.83% | 37.69% | 3.27% | 31.62% | -6.60% | 8.16% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.25% | 17.65% | 25.21% | 26.13% | -18.75% | 29.80% | 17.14% | 31.62% | -5.77% | 9.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBU.L and VUSA.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, BYBU.L and VUSA.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Technology
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Consumer Cyclical
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Industrials
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Healthcare
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Energy
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Communication Services
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Consumer Defensive
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Basic Materials
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Real Estate
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Utilities
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBU.L
VUSA.L
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBU.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 3.19 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 13.78 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBU.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.48 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBU.L and VUSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBU.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -33.50% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.19% | -8.69% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -18.45% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.11% | -25.32% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.54% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -3.71% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.02% | -0.14% |
Volatility
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that BYBU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYBU.L | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 2.60% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 7.99% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 11.18% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 15.63% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 16.21% | +11.53% |
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BYBU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BYBU.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYBU.L and VUSA.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBU.L.
BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBU.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.
Find the right allocation for BYBU.L and VUSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer