BXSL vs. TFLO
BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock, while TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 7.21%/yr vs 4.74%/yr for TFLO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BXSL vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -8.70% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.59% return.
BXSL
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -11.93%
- 1Y
- -17.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
BXSL vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -8.70% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 24.96% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.59% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.99% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXSL and TFLO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXSL vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank
BXSL
TFLO
BXSL vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BXSL | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -52.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 13.94 | -13.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 201.22 | -201.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 823.26 | -824.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BXSL | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 14.09 | -14.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 10.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 5.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.99 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
BXSL vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and TFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXSL | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.80% | -5.01% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -0.02% | -23.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | -0.04% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.50% | 0.00% | -22.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -0.10% | -14.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 0.00% | +15.37% |
Volatility
BXSL vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that BXSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXSL | TFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 0.07% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 0.20% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 0.28% | +19.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 0.35% | +23.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 0.46% | +23.27% |
Dividends
BXSL vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison
BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, more than TFLO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 13.24% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.90% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BXSL and TFLO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BXSL has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs TFLO's -5.01%.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXSL and TFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer