PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXMT vs. LFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BXMT vs. LFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXMT achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly higher than LFT's -26.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BXMT has outperformed LFT with an annualized return of 5.02%, while LFT has yielded a comparatively lower -3.37% annualized return.


BXMT

1D
1.46%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-5.60%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
5.02%

LFT

1D
-2.91%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-27.77%
1Y
-54.81%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-15.79%
10Y*
-3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXMT vs. LFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
-3.07%21.13%-7.90%13.46%-24.03%20.27%-17.83%25.16%6.95%15.77%
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
-26.79%-39.33%29.40%38.64%-45.07%28.63%15.69%23.31%-22.06%-9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BXMT and LFT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2013

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BXMT:

$3.06B

LFT:

$52.40M

EPS

BXMT:

$0.61

LFT:

-$0.06

PS Ratio

BXMT:

2.01

LFT:

0.92

PB Ratio

BXMT:

0.90

LFT:

0.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

BXMT:

$1.54B

LFT:

$56.81M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BXMT:

$960.53M

LFT:

$63.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

BXMT:

$957.49M

LFT:

$37.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXMT vs. LFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXMT
BXMT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BXMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LFT
LFT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXMT vs. LFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BXMTLFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.78

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-1.00

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-1.57

+2.17

BXMT vs. LFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the LFT Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXMT and LFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BXMT vs. LFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXMT drawdown since its inception was -97.98%, which is greater than LFT's maximum drawdown of -81.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXMT and LFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXMTLFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.98%

-81.57%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.02%

-55.07%

+43.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-59.51%

+36.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.02%

-59.51%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.86%

-77.00%

+9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.94%

-61.22%

+26.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.05%

-33.00%

-16.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

34.92%

-29.44%

Volatility

BXMT vs. LFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) is 7.13%, while Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that BXMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXMTLFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

13.71%

-6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

33.38%

-16.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

47.45%

-25.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.75%

35.31%

-7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.64%

41.48%

-8.84%

Dividends

BXMT vs. LFT - Dividend Comparison

BXMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than LFT's 18.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
10.39%9.83%12.52%11.66%11.71%8.10%9.01%6.66%7.78%7.71%8.25%8.52%
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
18.00%15.60%15.50%11.16%12.63%9.38%11.16%9.13%9.79%13.75%41.20%24.73%

Financials

BXMT vs. LFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. and Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
380.15M
0
(BXMT) Total Revenue
(LFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BXMT and LFT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFT has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to BXMT (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXMT dropped -97.98% vs LFT's -81.57%.

BXMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXMT and LFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer