PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXFIX vs. PLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXFIX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than PLFRX's 1.43% return.


BXFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.60%
6M
0.98%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.53%

PLFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.35%
YTD
1.43%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
5.03%
ALL TIME*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
0.48%4.72%6.83%10.26%-5.65%0.41%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
1.43%6.68%8.38%13.94%-2.01%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BXFIX and PLFRX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.63

The correlation between BXFIX and PLFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXFIX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BXFIX
BXFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BXFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BXFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PLFRX
PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BXFIXPLFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.58

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.54

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

8.54

-4.84

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the PLFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXFIX and PLFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum PLFRX drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXFIX and PLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXFIXPLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-18.75%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-1.73%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.92%

-2.17%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.22%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-0.72%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.51%

+0.08%

Volatility

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.25%. This indicates that BXFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXFIXPLFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.25%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.92%

1.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52%

2.49%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

2.80%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.99%

3.77%

-0.78%

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BXFIX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BXFIX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison

BXFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than PLFRX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
6.67%7.58%7.30%6.10%4.35%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLFRX
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income
6.37%7.18%8.47%8.92%4.39%3.65%3.68%5.10%5.03%4.46%4.21%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BXFIX and PLFRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXFIX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to PLFRX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXFIX dropped -9.12% vs PLFRX's -18.75%.

PLFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXFIX and PLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer