PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXFIX vs. RCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXFIX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than RCRIX's 1.91% return.


BXFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*

RCRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
0.56%4.72%6.83%10.26%-5.65%0.41%
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
1.91%5.56%10.01%9.85%-0.72%0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BXFIX and RCRIX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXFIX vs. RCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXFIX
BXFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BXFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BXFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RCRIX
RCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BXFIXRCRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

6.73

-5.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

19.90

-17.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

8.37

-6.94

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

28.07

-25.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.12

175.33

-168.21

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the RCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 6.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXFIX and RCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BXFIXRCRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

6.73

-5.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.08

+0.16

Drawdowns

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum RCRIX drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXFIX and RCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXFIXRCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-30.00%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-0.19%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.92%

-1.93%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-3.01%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.03%

+0.55%

Volatility

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that BXFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXFIXRCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.21%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

0.60%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

0.77%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

1.60%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

7.93%

-4.91%

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BXFIX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than RCRIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BXFIX vs. RCRIX - Dividend Comparison

BXFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than RCRIX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
7.29%7.58%7.30%6.10%4.35%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RCRIX
RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund
4.95%5.30%6.85%7.90%3.80%2.34%3.16%3.36%49.16%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BXFIX and RCRIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXFIX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to RCRIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXFIX dropped -9.12% vs RCRIX's -30.00%.

RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.73 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXFIX and RCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer