PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWXT vs. PEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWXT vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWXT achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BWXT has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 20.03%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.62% annualized return.


BWXT

1D
-0.63%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
12.23%
6M
10.82%
1Y
41.19%
3Y*
43.24%
5Y*
26.18%
10Y*
20.03%

PEP

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
2.49%
6M
-2.36%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
-4.09%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
6.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWXT vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
12.23%56.37%46.53%33.87%23.30%-19.40%-1.54%64.48%-36.10%53.59%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.49%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%27.38%-4.81%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BWXT and PEP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010

0.21

The correlation between BWXT and PEP shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWXT:

$17.78B

PEP:

$197.79B

EPS

BWXT:

$3.75

PEP:

$6.37

PE Ratio

BWXT:

51.53

PEP:

22.64

PEG Ratio

BWXT:

13.62

PEP:

7.83

PS Ratio

BWXT:

5.26

PEP:

2.07

PB Ratio

BWXT:

13.89

PEP:

9.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWXT:

$3.38B

PEP:

$95.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWXT:

$566.27M

PEP:

$51.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

BWXT:

$534.48M

PEP:

$15.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWXT vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWXT
BWXT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BWXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWXT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BWXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWXT vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWXTPEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

0.83

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

2.11

+1.94

BWXT vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWXT and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWXT vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWXT drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWXT and PEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWXTPEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-73.92%

+26.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.14%

-16.25%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.87%

-29.17%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

-30.32%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.74%

-30.32%

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-17.75%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-13.65%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

6.37%

+3.85%

Volatility

BWXT vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 5.39%. This indicates that BWXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWXTPEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

5.39%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.21%

14.62%

+19.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.12%

21.71%

+23.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.05%

18.39%

+14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.83%

19.67%

+11.16%

Dividends

BWXT vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PEP's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
0.54%0.58%0.86%1.20%1.52%1.75%1.26%1.10%1.67%0.69%0.91%30.37%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.98%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%

Financials

BWXT vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BWX Technologies, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
860.22M
19.44B
(BWXT) Total Revenue
(PEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BWXT vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BWX Technologies, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
55.2%
Portfolio components
BWXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 860.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

BWXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 106.69M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

BWXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 91.19M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BWXT and PEP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWXT has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to PEP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWXT dropped -47.88% vs PEP's -73.92%.

BWXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWXT and PEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer