BWXT vs. CW
BWXT (BWX Technologies, Inc.) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BWXT in Aerospace & Defense, CW in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, BWXT returned 17.77%/yr vs 24.02%/yr for CW. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BWXT vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWXT achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 31.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BWXT has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 17.77%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.02% annualized return.
BWXT
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- 6M
- -17.66%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 35.65%
- 5Y*
- 25.48%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.81%
CW
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 1Y
- 46.91%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- 44.17%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $144.95M | $152.77M | $192.56M | |
| $151.67M | $160.90M | $206.01M |
BWXT vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | -2.13% | 56.37% | 46.53% | 33.87% | 23.30% | -19.40% | -1.54% | 64.48% | -36.10% | 53.59% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 31.42% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWXT and CW is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, BWXT and CW have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BWXT:
$15.46B
CW:
$26.75B
BWXT:
$3.75
CW:
$13.69
BWXT:
44.96
CW:
52.89
BWXT:
11.88
CW:
2.89
BWXT:
4.59
CW:
7.50
BWXT:
12.11
CW:
10.19
BWXT:
$3.38B
CW:
$3.61B
BWXT:
$566.27M
CW:
$1.34B
BWXT:
$534.48M
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWXT vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
BWXT
CW
BWXT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWXT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 3.37 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 9.71 | -8.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWXT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWXT drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWXT and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWXT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -59.19% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.88% | -14.30% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.88% | -27.21% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.88% | -27.21% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.74% | -48.73% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.15% | -8.67% | -20.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -13.86% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.12% | 4.95% | +8.17% |
Volatility
BWXT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 12.78%. This indicates that BWXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWXT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.83% | 12.78% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.59% | 27.31% | +7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.14% | 34.97% | +12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 28.23% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.18% | 30.49% | +0.69% |
Dividends
BWXT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than CW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | 0.62% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 1.26% | 1.10% | 1.67% | 0.69% | 0.91% | 30.37% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
BWXT vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BWX Technologies, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BWXT vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
BWXT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 860.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
BWXT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 106.69M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
BWXT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BWX Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 91.19M and revenue of 860.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BWXT and CW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWXT has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to CW (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWXT dropped -47.88% vs CW's -59.19%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWXT and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer