PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWXT vs. CCO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
18.48%56.37%46.53%33.87%23.30%-19.40%-1.54%64.48%-36.10%53.59%
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
18.83%78.54%19.38%90.76%4.23%63.38%51.62%-21.22%23.59%-8.78%
Different Trading Currencies

BWXT is traded in USD, while CCO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWXT:

$18.78B

CCO.TO:

CA$65.88B

EPS

BWXT:

$3.59

CCO.TO:

CA$1.35

PE Ratio

BWXT:

56.90

CCO.TO:

111.74

PEG Ratio

BWXT:

15.04

CCO.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

BWXT:

5.87

CCO.TO:

18.92

PB Ratio

BWXT:

15.23

CCO.TO:

9.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWXT:

$3.20B

CCO.TO:

CA$3.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWXT:

$1.58B

CCO.TO:

CA$1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

BWXT:

$404.46M

CCO.TO:

CA$842.73M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BWXT having a 18.48% return and CCO.TO slightly higher at 18.83%. Over the past 10 years, BWXT has underperformed CCO.TO with an annualized return of 21.14%, while CCO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.00% annualized return.


BWXT

1D
6.73%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
18.48%
6M
11.22%
1Y
108.65%
3Y*
49.42%
5Y*
26.54%
10Y*
21.14%

CCO.TO

1D
5.79%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
18.83%
6M
29.93%
1Y
164.72%
3Y*
61.09%
5Y*
44.93%
10Y*
25.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWXT vs. CCO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWXT
BWXT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BWXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWXT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BWXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CCO.TO
CCO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWXTCCO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

3.04

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.58

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

6.25

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.70

16.66

-3.96

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWXT Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWXT and CCO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWXTCCO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

3.04

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.91

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.54

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.33

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BWXT and CCO.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison

BWXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than CCO.TO's 0.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
0.50%0.58%0.86%1.20%1.52%1.75%1.26%1.10%1.67%0.69%0.91%30.37%
CCO.TO
Cameco Corporation
0.16%0.19%0.22%0.21%0.39%0.29%0.47%0.69%0.52%3.45%2.85%2.34%

Drawdowns

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWXT drawdown since its inception was -47.88%, smaller than the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -85.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWXT and CCO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BWXTCCO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.88%

-83.63%

+35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.01%

-24.86%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-39.52%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.74%

-52.84%

+5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-16.72%

+8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.20%

-39.18%

+25.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

9.48%

-1.02%

Volatility

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison

BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) has a higher volatility of 18.71% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) at 17.23%. This indicates that BWXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BWXTCCO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.71%

17.23%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.25%

41.74%

-7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.92%

54.64%

-8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

49.76%

-17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.32%

46.34%

-16.02%

Financials

BWXT vs. CCO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BWX Technologies, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
885.84M
1.20B
(BWXT) Total Revenue
(CCO.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BWXT values in USD, CCO.TO values in CAD