BWFG vs. FSBC
BWFG (Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.) and FSBC (Five Star Bancorp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, BWFG returned 18.26%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for FSBC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BWFG vs. FSBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWFG achieves a 23.75% return, which is significantly lower than FSBC's 30.55% return.
BWFG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 23.75%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- 62.74%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 18.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
FSBC
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 6M
- 26.24%
- 1Y
- 78.61%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BWFG vs. FSBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWFG Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. | 23.75% | 50.33% | 7.06% | 5.76% | -8.20% | 21.20% |
FSBC Five Star Bancorp | 30.55% | 22.06% | 18.61% | -0.56% | -7.16% | 51.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWFG and FSBC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between BWFG and FSBC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BWFG:
$5.06
FSBC:
$4.21
BWFG:
11.12
FSBC:
10.90
BWFG:
0.19
FSBC:
5.22
BWFG:
2.11
FSBC:
3.73
BWFG:
$208.27M
FSBC:
$196.28M
BWFG:
$84.18M
FSBC:
$114.56M
BWFG:
$42.64M
FSBC:
$64.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWFG vs. FSBC — Risk / Return Rank
BWFG
FSBC
BWFG vs. FSBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) and Five Star Bancorp (FSBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWFG | FSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.50 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 6.04 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 17.69 | -4.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWFG vs. FSBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWFG drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than FSBC's maximum drawdown of -40.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWFG and FSBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWFG | FSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -40.76% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -13.07% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -25.42% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.80% | -40.76% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -13.21% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 4.46% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BWFG vs. FSBC - Volatility Comparison
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Five Star Bancorp (FSBC) at 5.56%. This indicates that BWFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWFG | FSBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 5.56% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 15.90% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.59% | 25.95% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 31.43% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 32.80% | -1.96% |
Dividends
BWFG vs. FSBC - Dividend Comparison
BWFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FSBC's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWFG Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.75% | 3.21% | 2.65% | 2.72% | 1.95% | 2.86% | 1.80% | 1.67% | 0.82% | 0.68% | 0.25% |
FSBC Five Star Bancorp | 2.51% | 2.24% | 2.66% | 2.86% | 2.20% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BWFG vs. FSBC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. and Five Star Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BWFG and FSBC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWFG has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to FSBC (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWFG dropped -64.64% vs FSBC's -40.76%.
FSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWFG and FSBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer