BWFG vs. NEM
BWFG (Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. BWFG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BWFG returned 14.63%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for NEM. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BWFG vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWFG achieves a 49.91% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BWFG has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 14.63%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.
BWFG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 42.54%
- YTD
- 49.91%
- 1Y
- 77.41%
- 3Y*
- 38.98%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.44%
NEM
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- YTD
- -5.74%
- 1Y
- 51.31%
- 3Y*
- 33.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.39M | $5.14M | $3.95M | |
| $671.95M | $683.19M | $803.32M |
BWFG vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWFG Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. | 49.91% | 50.33% | 7.06% | 5.76% | -8.20% | 71.96% | -29.99% | 2.33% | -15.09% | 6.55% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -5.74% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWFG and NEM is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010 | 0.04 |
The correlation between BWFG and NEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BWFG:
$543.37M
NEM:
$98.74B
BWFG:
$5.46
NEM:
$7.88
BWFG:
12.47
NEM:
11.89
BWFG:
0.22
NEM:
0.31
BWFG:
2.47
NEM:
5.34
BWFG:
1.66
NEM:
2.82
BWFG:
$216.69M
NEM:
$19.13B
BWFG:
$120.85M
NEM:
$10.94B
BWFG:
$61.62M
NEM:
$14.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWFG vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
BWFG
NEM
BWFG vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWFG | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.21 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 1.64 | +4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.44 | 3.61 | +11.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWFG vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWFG drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWFG and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWFG | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -81.30% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -32.10% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -36.57% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.80% | -62.40% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.64% | -62.40% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.67% | +28.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -41.33% | +21.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 14.57% | -9.77% |
Volatility
BWFG vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is 8.77%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that BWFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWFG | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 11.58% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 37.40% | -18.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 47.45% | -21.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 38.35% | -9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 35.74% | -4.79% |
Dividends
BWFG vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
BWFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than NEM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWFG Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.75% | 3.21% | 2.65% | 2.72% | 1.95% | 2.86% | 1.80% | 1.67% | 0.82% | 0.68% | 0.25% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.09% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
BWFG vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BWFG and NEM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to BWFG (8.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWFG dropped -64.64% vs NEM's -81.30%.
BWFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWFG and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer