BWET vs. NRGU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BWET returned 2150.47% vs 147.96% for NRGU. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BWET charges 3.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

BWET vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 1,246.34% return, which is significantly higher than NRGU's 139.31% return.

BWET

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: 52.08%
• 6M: 619.27%
• YTD: 1,246.34%
• 1Y: 2,150.47%
• 3Y*: 135.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 144.54%

NRGU

• 1D: -6.93%
• 1M: 40.77%
• 6M: 89.59%
• YTD: 139.31%
• 1Y: 147.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 42.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	$45.42M	$38.94M	$29.75M
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	$4.50M	$4.24M	$3.94M

BWET vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,246.34%	67.52%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.31%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and NRGU is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

BWET vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 73
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BWET vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BWET	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	20.19	1.93	+18.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.36	2.32	+4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.91	1.29	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	52.86	3.39	+49.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	198.46	7.61	+190.85

BWET vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 20.19, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BWET vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWET	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-57.50%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.22%	-43.89%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-17.46%	+14.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.38%	-25.72%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.96%	19.53%	-8.57%

Volatility

BWET vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 31.04% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 24.63%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWET	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.04%	24.63%	+6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.74%	64.77%	+30.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	108.15%	77.42%	+30.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.45%	88.56%	-14.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.45%	88.56%	-14.11%

BWET vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWET vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWET nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWET and NRGU in my portfolio?

BWET and NRGU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWET or NRGU?

BWET has higher volatility (31.04%) compared to NRGU (24.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, BWET or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 2150.47% vs 147.96% for NRGU. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 24.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWET or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 2150.47% return vs 147.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWET or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWET or NRGU?

BWET and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BWET and NRGU?

BWET is categorized as Commodities, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and BMO. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.19 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.