BWET vs. BCI
BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds - BWET tracks the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index while BCI tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BWET returned 135.18%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for BCI. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BWET charges 3.50%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
BWET vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 1,246.34% return, which is significantly higher than BCI's 21.35% return.
BWET
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 619.27%
- YTD
- 1,246.34%
- 1Y
- 2,150.47%
- 3Y*
- 135.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 144.54%
BCI
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.69M | $55.82M | $39.30M | |
| $45.42M | $38.94M | $29.75M |
BWET vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 1,246.34% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 14.13% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 21.35% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWET and BCI is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWET vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
BWET
BCI
BWET vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWET | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.91 | 1.34 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 52.86 | 2.32 | +50.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 198.46 | 7.40 | +191.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWET vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWET | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.90% | -32.69% | -24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.22% | -14.82% | -26.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.81% | -14.82% | -41.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -8.53% | +5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -11.96% | -11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 4.64% | +6.32% |
Volatility
BWET vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 31.04% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.19%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWET | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.04% | 5.19% | +25.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.74% | 14.85% | +80.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.15% | 17.60% | +90.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.45% | 16.86% | +57.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.45% | 15.68% | +58.77% |
BWET vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWET vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.59% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWET and BCI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWET has higher volatility (31.04%) compared to BCI (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs BCI's -32.69%.
On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 135.18% vs 11.83% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 135.18% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.59%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.26% for BCI.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.19 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWET and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer