PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWEN vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWEN vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWEN achieves a 47.70% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BWEN has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -0.71%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.


BWEN

1D
2.96%
1M
55.39%
YTD
47.70%
6M
29.41%
1Y
147.34%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
-0.71%

SMH

1D
-1.63%
1M
20.06%
YTD
74.25%
6M
74.08%
1Y
150.04%
3Y*
63.96%
5Y*
38.76%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWEN vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
47.70%50.53%-32.13%54.75%-4.79%-76.29%377.71%27.69%-52.21%-32.76%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
74.25%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BWEN and SMH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2004

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWEN vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWEN
BWEN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BWEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BWEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWEN vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWENSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.69

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

10.11

-7.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

38.76

-33.15

BWEN vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWEN and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWENSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

4.94

-3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

1.11

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

1.15

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.34

-0.39

Drawdowns

BWEN vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWEN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWEN and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWENSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-84.96%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.75%

-14.93%

-35.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.28%

-35.74%

-33.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.18%

-45.30%

-30.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.79%

-45.30%

-42.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.54%

-1.63%

-96.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.17%

-41.08%

-40.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.36%

3.89%

+22.47%

Volatility

BWEN vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) has a higher volatility of 92.56% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.58%. This indicates that BWEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWENSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

92.56%

11.58%

+80.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

109.12%

24.35%

+84.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.34%

30.57%

+119.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.68%

35.01%

+70.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.24%

32.57%

+59.67%

Dividends

BWEN vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

BWEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWEN and SMH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWEN has higher volatility (92.56%) compared to SMH (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWEN dropped -99.58% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWEN and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer