BVN vs. GFI
BVN (Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — BVN in Other Precious Metals & Mining, GFI in Gold. Over the past 10 years, BVN returned 13.54%/yr vs 27.45%/yr for GFI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BVN vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BVN achieves a 23.58% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BVN has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 13.54%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.45% annualized return.
BVN
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -13.13%
- YTD
- 23.58%
- 6M
- 22.13%
- 1Y
- 105.88%
- 3Y*
- 70.14%
- 5Y*
- 27.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
BVN vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 23.58% | 147.96% | -24.06% | 106.47% | 2.47% | -39.95% | -19.27% | -6.40% | 15.91% | 25.66% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BVN and GFI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BVN and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BVN:
$8.49B
GFI:
$32.65B
BVN:
$3.84
GFI:
$5.39
BVN:
8.69
GFI:
6.78
BVN:
0.02
GFI:
0.11
BVN:
4.15
GFI:
2.34
BVN:
2.05
GFI:
3.87
BVN:
$2.05B
GFI:
$13.98B
BVN:
$1.06B
GFI:
$7.34B
BVN:
$1.18B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BVN vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
BVN
GFI
BVN vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BVN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 1.15 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 3.06 | +5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BVN vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVN drawdown since its inception was -93.68%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVN and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.68% | -88.05% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | -43.90% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.30% | -43.90% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -56.22% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.15% | -63.09% | -7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.25% | -38.93% | +7.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.40% | -44.25% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 16.51% | -4.38% |
Volatility
BVN vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 17.70%. This indicates that BVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BVN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.09% | 17.70% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.55% | 46.40% | -3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.28% | 59.94% | -9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.80% | 52.37% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.95% | 54.90% | -8.95% |
Dividends
BVN vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
BVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVN Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. | 3.40% | 1.57% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
BVN vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BVN vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
BVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a gross profit of 356.89M and revenue of 622.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
BVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported an operating income of 325.55M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.3%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
BVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. reported a net income of 334.26M and revenue of 622.46M, resulting in a net margin of 53.7%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BVN and GFI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BVN has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to GFI (17.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVN dropped -93.68% vs GFI's -88.05%.
BVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BVN and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer