PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVAL vs. VFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVAL vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 20.09% return.


BVAL

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.10%
YTD
11.47%
6M
11.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFLO

1D
-0.44%
1M
10.60%
YTD
20.09%
6M
21.04%
1Y
38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
11.47%11.38%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
20.09%13.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and VFLO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.72

BVAL vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BVAL
VFLO

Technology

20.1%
38.4%

Financial Services

16.9%
0.0%

Industrials

11.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

11.1%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
0.0%

Energy

6.8%
12.2%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.7%

Utilities

4.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.3%

Technology

BVAL
20.1%
VFLO
38.4%

Financial Services

BVAL
16.9%
VFLO
0.0%

Industrials

BVAL
11.8%
VFLO
3.4%

Healthcare

BVAL
11.1%
VFLO
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BVAL
8.9%
VFLO
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

BVAL
8.2%
VFLO
0.0%

Energy

BVAL
6.8%
VFLO
12.2%

Communication Services

BVAL
5.2%
VFLO
4.7%

Utilities

BVAL
4.3%
VFLO
1.7%

Real Estate

BVAL
3.5%
VFLO
0.0%

Basic Materials

BVAL
3.1%
VFLO
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVAL vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAL

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BVAL vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BVALVFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

1.63

+0.91

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum VFLO drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and VFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVALVFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-17.79%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-2.08%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-2.42%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

BVAL vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVALVFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

15.02%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

15.93%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

15.93%

-5.80%

BVAL vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BVAL vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than VFLO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.19%1.60%1.20%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVAL and VFLO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.39% for VFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVAL and VFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer