BVAL vs. ROE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

BVAL vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.

BVAL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: 20.98%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 37.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	11.47%	11.38%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	20.98%	13.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and ROE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.86

BVAL vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BVAL	ROE
Technology	20.1%	36.1%
Financial Services	16.9%	11.7%
Industrials	11.8%	9.8%
Healthcare	11.1%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	4.7%
Energy	6.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	5.2%	10.6%
Utilities	4.3%	1.9%
Real Estate	3.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	3.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BVAL	ROE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	1.39	+1.16

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-19.10%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.04%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-2.59%	+1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	13.94%	-3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.13%	15.78%	-5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.13%	15.78%	-5.65%

BVAL vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVAL vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ROE's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.94%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and ROE in my portfolio?

BVAL and ROE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or ROE?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or ROE?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or ROE?

BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.

What is the main difference between BVAL and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.49% for ROE.