BVAL vs. PGRI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and PGRI (Putnam International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while PGRI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PGRI.

Performance

BVAL vs. PGRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than PGRI's 7.30% return.

BVAL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 10.01%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 1Y: 25.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.29%

PGRI

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 1.66%
• YTD: 7.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	$658.39K	$641.04K	$1.02M
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF	$3.61K	$1.81K	$14.22K

BVAL vs. PGRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	14.62%	2.59%
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF	7.30%	-1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and PGRI is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. PGRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BVAL

BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 90
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PGRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BVAL vs. PGRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BVAL	PGRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.14	—	—

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. PGRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum PGRI drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and PGRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	PGRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-12.87%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.74%	+4.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.86%	-3.29%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	PGRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33%	20.65%	-10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.18%	20.65%	-10.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.18%	20.65%	-10.47%

BVAL vs. PGRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PGRI's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVAL vs. PGRI - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than PGRI's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	1.30%	0.73%
PGRI Putnam International Stock ETF	0.11%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and PGRI in my portfolio?

BVAL and PGRI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or PGRI?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or PGRI?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or PGRI?

BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.11% for PGRI.

What is the main difference between BVAL and PGRI?

BVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PGRI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.55% for PGRI.