BVAL vs. FNDX
BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
BVAL vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
BVAL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
BVAL vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 11.47% | 11.38% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 14.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BVAL and FNDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.97 |
BVAL vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BVAL
FNDX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BVAL
FNDX
Financial Services
BVAL
FNDX
Industrials
BVAL
FNDX
Healthcare
BVAL
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
BVAL
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
BVAL
FNDX
Energy
BVAL
FNDX
Communication Services
BVAL
FNDX
Utilities
BVAL
FNDX
Real Estate
BVAL
FNDX
Basic Materials
BVAL
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BVAL vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
BVAL
FNDX
BVAL vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 0.79 | +1.75 |
Drawdowns
BVAL vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -37.72% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.13% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -3.55% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
BVAL vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 10.22% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 15.18% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 17.50% | -7.37% |
BVAL vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BVAL vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 0.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BVAL and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for BVAL and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer