PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVAL vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVAL vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


BVAL

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.10%
YTD
11.47%
6M
11.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and FNDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.97

BVAL vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BVAL
FNDX

Technology

20.1%
19.1%

Financial Services

16.9%
14.1%

Industrials

11.8%
9.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
7.4%

Energy

6.8%
10.3%

Communication Services

5.2%
10.1%

Utilities

4.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.7%

Technology

BVAL
20.1%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

BVAL
16.9%
FNDX
14.1%

Industrials

BVAL
11.8%
FNDX
9.3%

Healthcare

BVAL
11.1%
FNDX
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BVAL
8.9%
FNDX
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

BVAL
8.2%
FNDX
7.4%

Energy

BVAL
6.8%
FNDX
10.3%

Communication Services

BVAL
5.2%
FNDX
10.1%

Utilities

BVAL
4.3%
FNDX
3.2%

Real Estate

BVAL
3.5%
FNDX
1.8%

Basic Materials

BVAL
3.1%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVAL vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAL

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BVAL vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BVALFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

0.79

+1.75

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVALFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-37.72%

+31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.13%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-3.55%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

BVAL vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVALFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

10.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

15.18%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

17.50%

-7.37%

BVAL vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BVAL vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BVAL and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVAL and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer