BVAL vs. DIVB

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. Over the past year, BVAL returned 22.23% vs 26.41% for DIVB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.

Performance

BVAL vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 19.48% return.

BVAL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.94%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVB

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 17.14%
• YTD: 19.48%
• 1Y: 26.41%
• 3Y*: 20.96%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	13.29%	12.09%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	19.48%	9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and DIVB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.83

The correlation between BVAL and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAL

BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

DIVB

DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 85
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BVAL	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.19	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.07	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	3.89	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	13.05	+0.78

BVAL vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVAL and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and DIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	DIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-36.93%	+30.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	-6.82%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-2.17%	+1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-4.94%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.03%	-0.42%

Volatility

BVAL vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) is 2.46%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that BVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	DIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	4.43%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	9.31%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	12.09%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.20%	15.33%	-5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.20%	18.35%	-8.15%

BVAL vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BVAL vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than DIVB's 2.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	1.32%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	2.22%	2.50%	2.61%	3.18%	2.02%	1.63%	2.08%	2.07%	2.52%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and DIVB in my portfolio?

BVAL and DIVB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BVAL or DIVB?

DIVB has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to BVAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVAL dropped -6.69% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or DIVB?

On 1-year performance, DIVB leads with 26.41% vs 22.23% for BVAL. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BVAL or DIVB?

Over the 1-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 26.41% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or DIVB?

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or DIVB?

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.32% for BVAL.

What is the main difference between BVAL and DIVB?

BVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.05% for DIVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.