PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


BUZZ

1D
-2.53%
1M
14.04%
YTD
22.01%
6M
16.69%
1Y
44.51%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
22.01%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-0.89%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and QUS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.70

The correlation between BUZZ and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUZZ vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUZZ
QUS

Technology

49.0%
26.3%

Communication Services

12.9%
10.2%

Financial Services

12.8%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
5.8%

Industrials

5.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

4.9%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
9.2%

Utilities

0.9%
3.6%

Energy

0.6%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

BUZZ
49.0%
QUS
26.3%

Communication Services

BUZZ
12.9%
QUS
10.2%

Financial Services

BUZZ
12.8%
QUS
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BUZZ
11.9%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

BUZZ
5.2%
QUS
8.6%

Healthcare

BUZZ
4.9%
QUS
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

BUZZ
1.4%
QUS
9.2%

Utilities

BUZZ
0.9%
QUS
3.6%

Energy

BUZZ
0.6%
QUS
4.6%

Basic Materials

BUZZ
0.3%
QUS
2.3%

Real Estate

BUZZ

-

QUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUZZQUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.95

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

2.81

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.59

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.56

11.54

-7.98

BUZZ vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUZZQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.95

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.78

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.77

-0.44

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-33.78%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-6.85%

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-13.94%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

-22.30%

-34.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-0.50%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-3.70%

-20.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

1.53%

+11.02%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

1.78%

+7.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.67%

6.66%

+17.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.35%

9.09%

+22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

14.33%

+18.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

16.42%

+16.27%

BUZZ vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and QUS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUZZ has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer