PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than MFUS's 16.37% return.


BUZZ

1D
-2.53%
1M
14.04%
YTD
22.01%
6M
16.69%
1Y
44.51%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
22.01%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-0.89%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and MFUS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021

0.68

The correlation between BUZZ and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUZZ
MFUS

Technology

49.0%
21.8%

Communication Services

12.9%
5.3%

Financial Services

12.8%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
10.6%

Industrials

5.2%
12.6%

Healthcare

4.9%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
10.3%

Utilities

0.9%
1.7%

Energy

0.6%
7.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

BUZZ
49.0%
MFUS
21.8%

Communication Services

BUZZ
12.9%
MFUS
5.3%

Financial Services

BUZZ
12.8%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BUZZ
11.9%
MFUS
10.6%

Industrials

BUZZ
5.2%
MFUS
12.6%

Healthcare

BUZZ
4.9%
MFUS
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

BUZZ
1.4%
MFUS
10.3%

Utilities

BUZZ
0.9%
MFUS
1.7%

Energy

BUZZ
0.6%
MFUS
7.0%

Basic Materials

BUZZ
0.3%
MFUS
2.8%

Real Estate

BUZZ

-

MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUZZMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

4.41

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

18.13

-14.57

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUZZMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.63

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.86

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-35.21%

-21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-6.39%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-15.39%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

-18.22%

-38.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

0.00%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-4.00%

-20.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

1.55%

+11.00%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

3.19%

+6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.67%

8.22%

+15.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.35%

10.72%

+20.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

15.03%

+17.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

17.35%

+15.34%

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and MFUS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUZZ has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer