BUZZ vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BUZZ is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUZZ returned 9.80%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

BUZZ vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

BUZZ

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 14.04%
• YTD: 22.01%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: 44.51%
• 3Y*: 36.58%
• 5Y*: 9.80%
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	22.01%	30.61%	33.74%	54.64%	-47.67%	-0.89%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and IQM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2021	0.82

The correlation between BUZZ and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUZZ vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUZZ	IQM
Technology	49.0%	65.9%
Communication Services	12.9%	2.1%
Financial Services	12.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	4.1%
Industrials	5.2%	19.9%
Healthcare	4.9%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Utilities	0.9%	3.3%
Energy	0.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUZZ	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.67	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.11	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	5.13	-3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	16.79	-13.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUZZ vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUZZ	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	2.67	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.77	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.96	-0.63

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-44.91%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	-14.71%	-15.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-30.42%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	-44.91%	-11.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-0.37%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-12.25%	-11.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.55%	4.49%	+8.06%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) have volatilities of 9.36% and 9.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.36%	9.20%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.67%	22.92%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.35%	28.27%	+3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.98%	28.91%	+4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.69%	30.72%	+1.97%

BUZZ vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUZZ nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUZZ and IQM in my portfolio?

BUZZ and IQM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUZZ or IQM?

BUZZ has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to IQM (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, BUZZ or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 9.80% for BUZZ. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQM has been the lower-risk option at 9.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUZZ or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUZZ or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUZZ or IQM?

BUZZ and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUZZ and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.